Psychological Relatedness Factor influencing Performance in Archery

  • Irza Hanie Abu Samah Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Abdul Shukor Shamsudin Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Amer Darus Universiti Utara Malaysia

Abstract

This paper serves to explain the conceptual performance in archery that affected by psychological relatedness factor. Coaches, teammates and athlete play important role in every sport. Distinguishing and understanding each factor of psychological relatedness is important in determining the athlete’s performance. The inter-relatedness between coach and athlete is vital in bringing out the best performance of athletes. Despites of having advance tools and equipment in archery, however, archer’s performance still can be fluctuated, this may be due to the intangible factor which requires more study in the context. Thus this research served the theoretical explanation that may affect the athlete’s performance. This research suggests that factor such as coach; teammate and athlete should understand the way they communicate with each other, so that the interaction between them would not affect athletes’ performance. Therefore, future research should focus more on interrelationship existed between them and factors that might influence on athletes’ performance.

References

I. H. Abu Samah, S. O. Adekalu, Z. Omar, and I. A. Ismail, “Influence of Coaches ’ Behavior on Athletes ’ Motivation : Malaysian Sport Archery Experience,” Int. J. Res. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 136–142, 2013.

C. J. Gee, “How does sport psychology actually improve athletic performance? A framework to facilitate athletes’ and coaches’ understanding.,” Behav. Modif., vol. 34, pp. 386–402, 2010.

A. H. A. Muhamad Noor Mohamed, “Postural Sway And Shooting Accuracy Of Skilled Recurve Archers,” Movement, Heal. Exerc. 1, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2012.

L. L. Craft, T. M. Magyar, B. J. Becker, and D. L. Feltz, “The Relationship between the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 and Sport Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 2003.

R. E. Smith, F. L. Smoll, and S. P. Cumming, “Effects of a Motivational Climate Intervention for Coaches on Young Athletes’ Sport Performance Anxiety,” J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 2007.

A. Hafidz, B. H. Omar, D. Binti, and M. Dari, “Perbandingan Tahap Prestasi Atlet Memanah Melalui Ujian Blind Shoot Dan Ujian Pernafasan.,” 2008.

T. M. Hung, W. T. Tang, and T. Y. Shiang, “A case study of integrated sport sciences for an olympic archer,” J. Med. Biol. Eng., 2009.

S. a. Jackson, P. R. Thomas, H. W. Marsh, and C. J. Smethurst, “Relationships between Flow, Self-Concept, Psychological Skills, and Performance,” J. Appl. Sport Psychol., vol. 13, no. July 2000, pp. 129–153, 2001.

N. Gillet, R. J. Vallerand, S. Amoura, and B. Baldes, “Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation,” Psychol. Sport Exerc., 2010.

P. D. Turman, “Coaches’ Immediacy Behaviors as Predictors of Athletes’ Perceptions of Satisfaction and Team Cohesion,” West. J. Commun., vol. 72, no. October 2012, pp. 162–179, 2008.

R. Lorimer and A. Dundee, “The interdependence of coaches ’ and athletes ’ perceptions and satisfaction with performance,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 69–80, 2011.

E. Karreman, K. Dorsch, and H. Riemer, “Athlete Satisfaction and Leadership: Assessing Group-Level Effects,” Small Gr. Res., vol. 40, pp. 720–737, 2009.

C. Rusbult and P. Van Lange, “Interdependence theory.,” Handb. Theor. Soc. Psychol. Vol. 2, 1997.

G. a Mageau and R. J. Vallerand, “The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model.,” J. Sports Sci., vol. 21, pp. 883–904, 2003.

R. Lorimer, “The interdependence of coaches’ and athletes’ perceptions and satisfaction with performance,” Int. J. Coach. Sci., 2011.

R. Lorimer, “Coaches’ satisfaction with their athletic partnerships,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57–66, 2009.

P. Reimer, H. A., &Chelladurai, “Development of the athlete satisfaction questionnaire,” J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., vol. 20, p. 127–156., 1998.

A. Van den Broeck, M. Vansteenkiste, H. De Witte, B. Soenens, and W. Lens, “Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale,” J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 2010.

& D. W. J. (university of minnesota) R. R. J., “Johnson & Johnson,2005.pdf,” Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr., vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 285–358, 2005.

M. Camiré and P. Trudel, “High school athletes’ perspectives on character development through sport participation,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 193–207, 2010.

T. Y. Katz-Navon and M. Erez, “When collective- And self-efficacy affect team performance the role of task interdependence,” Small Gr. Res., 2005.

N. Gillet, R. J. Vallerand, S. Amoura, and B. Baldes, “Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation,” Psychol. Sport Exerc., vol. 11, pp. 155–161, 2010.

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” Am. Psychol., 2000.

Published
2019-01-08
How to Cite
[1]
I. H. Abu Samah, A. Shamsudin, and A. Darus, “Psychological Relatedness Factor influencing Performance in Archery”, Int. J. Innov. Technol. Interdisc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 192-199, Jan. 2019.